You think they’d put redundant switches on there ? Does look pretty small - LM"Ahh what are these switches."
It's likely a two-treble reeds set (LM) introductory instrument with a repeated set of switches (as a sales pitch): a pretty sure indication of a lower level unit.
Even so, they were, generally, better made than the same range instruments of today.
Is it 3/4 sized?
They certainly did! Hohner was just one such maker of many in the day!.You think they’d put redundant switches on there ? Does look pretty small - LM
Another L'artiste modelI had just read this bit about "repeat" registers here, and then saw on the Reddit accordion group this picture... which may take the cake for ghost registers.
Maybe so, but what's the sense in habituating tyros to doubled up couplers when, should they proceed to higher models, that wouldn't be an option?Redundant switches do make sense, because it means that the switch you need is always nearby, whether you are playing low, middle or high notes. I
Chin switches are also limited due to the area and mechanism. As long as a switch is cheaper than a reedblock set (which obviously is) they probably continue to make them. Even Hohner still does it. My Hohner bravo 3/96 have 7 switches. Must have been 5. There is a slight advantage to change the switch from near you play, but not really worth mentioning.Maybe so, but what's the sense in habituating tyros to doubled up couplers when, should they proceed to higher models, that wouldn't be an option?
In any case, how many couplers can you duplicate anyway: what about the other, unduplicated, couplers (as often happens in LMM or LMH models)?
What's the point of doubling them as chin switches anyway? Make them all chin switches in the first place! (Nothing along the grill)
There are higher-end models with two rows of register switches, where essentially the second row has the switches in the reverse order of the first row, so as to have all registers available in one half of the keyboard area.Maybe so, but what's the sense in habituating tyros to doubled up couplers when, should they proceed to higher models, that wouldn't be an option?
In any case, how many couplers can you duplicate anyway: what about the other, unduplicated, couplers (as often happens in LMM or LMH models)?
What's the point of doubling them as chin switches anyway? Make them all chin switches in the first place! (Nothing along the grill)
This discussion ended as Roland the "digital" accordion as the next step. People from Roland must have discussed these. I actually hate setup, on-off and charge ideas but many people wants the next step, doesnt matter how ridiculous are them. This also ended as High Inflation. You guys want the best of the best even in the grocery store?? So you pay the high price !!There are higher-end models with two rows of register switches, where essentially the second row has the switches in the reverse order of the first row, so as to have all registers available in one half of the keyboard area.
Chin switches have the advantage that you can continue playing while changing registers. The most you can have under the chin is 7 or 8, so you cannot have the 13 to 15 switches of many 4 or 5 voice accordions all under your chin. And you still need the register mechanism anyway even when the regular switches were eliminated. Some high end accordions have one or two chin switches that are "multi-position", offering a choice between two or even four registers under the same switch. Before you start playing a song you need to choose which register to select under that switch.
My (Pigini) bass accordion has just 4 registers (L, LM, LMH, LH) and all of them doubled as chin registers. But I believe that later in the production Pigini did away with the regular switches and offers just the chin switches. With 4 registers you can do that, with 15... no can do.
Does seem to needlessly complicate repairs and stuff, all these extra partsThis discussion ended as Roland the "digital" accordion as the next step. People from Roland must have discussed these. I actually hate setup, on-off and charge ideas but many people wants the next step, doesnt matter how ridiculous are them. This also ended as High Inflation. You guys want the best of the best even in the grocery store?? So you pay the high price !!
Yes you are smart but not a retired rich hobbyistDoes seem to needlessly complicate repairs and stuff, all these extra parts
Yes and no!Redundant switches do make sense, because it means that the switch you need is always nearby,
Well, the CBA analogy doesn't quite imply the same. It is really a choice that is a trade off between cognitive overhead (to choose which row to use) and easier fingering, important for fast runs and/or complex chords.Yes and no!
Although various likely reasons are offered for the duplication of coupler switches, it seems to me this creates an extra degree of freedom which forces a extra, ultimately needless choice on the player as to which particular switch to use at a given time.
It may be trivial but it still drains some brain power computing capacity needlessly.
This is essentially similar to CBAs providing alternative buttons ( in different locations) for the identical note : it requires the expenditure of processing effort to choose the appropriate location.
Of course, sufficient practice with a specific tune will automate the required response, but it necessitates extra effort, no matter how little.
So far no problem with my beard and the 8 chin switches. The only problem is that this leaves 7 registers that are not available as a chin switch... and one of these is the piccolo. How did I cope with my previous accordions that had just 3 to 5 chin switches...8 chin switches? You could eat a whole sandwich in one song (I mean tune). I guess I would have to shave off my beard so I didn’t hit piccolo by mistake . Whew, glad I didn’t have to consider 3 versus 8 for more “budget friendliness.” Ok, gotta go play some simple Italian sh*t at the market. Now where did I leave that chin switch? Just kidding (sayin’)!