David Colpitts
Member
Hello. I ask on a couple of sites (Accordionists Forum and Janko Keyboard FB group) because I just got an idea, and have no notion about whether it matters at all to a more sophisticated/experienced keyboarder.
I convert piano keyboards to Janko button keyboards with some small parts/arts and crafts. I read on some older Janko threads about the "minor" sacrifice of relinquishing the "normal" whole tone and the "normal" pentatonic glissandi, since the buttons are changed and in the way for finger/thumb glissing.
But(?) if I can leave space (a thumb width each, or a bit more) at the front for the white keys and the back for the black keys, is that any real advantage? I think it's quite easy for the white keys, at the very least, and doesn't degrade the other playing experience of the isomorphic Janko arrangement. A bit more crowded for the black keys at the back, but still doable.
So...does it make the accordion any more appealing to retain either or both of the glissandi potential? No more work, really, just more careful planning.
Thanks!
I convert piano keyboards to Janko button keyboards with some small parts/arts and crafts. I read on some older Janko threads about the "minor" sacrifice of relinquishing the "normal" whole tone and the "normal" pentatonic glissandi, since the buttons are changed and in the way for finger/thumb glissing.
But(?) if I can leave space (a thumb width each, or a bit more) at the front for the white keys and the back for the black keys, is that any real advantage? I think it's quite easy for the white keys, at the very least, and doesn't degrade the other playing experience of the isomorphic Janko arrangement. A bit more crowded for the black keys at the back, but still doable.
So...does it make the accordion any more appealing to retain either or both of the glissandi potential? No more work, really, just more careful planning.
Thanks!