Thanks Ventura!i cannot compare them, but i will say that for ME personally
i avoid Lire as a general rule, unless it is pristine
my feeling is based on just a lot of observed stuff, which
may not be fair but generally i found them to be not
nearly as reliable or robust as other brands, they tend to use
a lot of heavy chrome and they were thik un's to begin with,
the centromatic idea looks cool but did anyone ever swear by it?
and it is more complicated and has more rubbing surfaces and
seems to need servicing more often than straight line industry
standard shift mech's, add to that they were one of the ones used the
cheap bass button plastics that crumble.. so who knows if they
saved a buck here and there and used other components
also vulnerable to Ultra Violet
there are some sweet pre-ww2 Lire accordions around, and i am just
dissing the post war models
Thanks for your input Henry! I find the FIAS is a little more responsive in reed action and tone, probably due to the chamber. Some of the waterfall keys are cracked, and it’s a little more beat up as you know. But it’s a wonderful accordion and I wish I could keep them all. But alas, a guy from across the sea is coming to look at on Monday at a price respectful of its provenance, and I believe to a good home where it will be played. And I did charge extra for the dime on the side!The Lira in question is better made in terms of attention to detail in the mechanism and interior fit and finish than the FIAS you have as I recall. The FIAS has a tone chamber of course, and assuming the balky "straight line industry standard shift mechanism" (this particular instrument has very sluggish switches due to crud on the slides- no rust on the reeds et al though) gets fixed it'd be a wash functionally. They both have slides in the foundation plate.
The FIAS with the zippy side indicator buttons in the case above the upper bracket has real vintage old timey pizazz. The Lira is near perfect but has 50's 60's styling. I find both to be pretty appealing instruments in presented appearance.
Decent reeds on both- the valves are in marginally better condition on the Lira- but not so I'd write home about it.
The chrome on the Lira (27B) is pretty much perfect but the Liras- as do many Italian pieces of the era- has a bad track record for the chrome wearing through and showing brass. Same-same as with Alfa's and Fiats of the era!
Personally very much like the Centromatic - a matter of player's personal preference- and having had several, have never had an issue with the mechanism. It gets in the way if you ever need to level the keyboard and must be pulled off- a bit of a pain. Ventura may have come across some that went out of whack. Luck of the draw I suppose. He appears to have a pretty substantial base of experience in these things.
A sad thing that you don't have room for both- if you kicked your family to the curb couldn't you keep both and look for a third?
Good luck- find a good home for whichever one you cull.
I’m not sure of the FIAS origin. Seems like I recall maybe it evolved from the merger of two companies??? An acronym but I don’t know of what. Someone knows…..sounds like you have seen both of these boxes, so your
eval is likely a good analysis.. and sounds like you have had
personal success with Centro's and like them.. i have no doubt..
it is a cool look and obviously having an exclusive selling feature
was very desirable back when the market was fiercely contested
anyone know what parts of the country they were marketed strongly in ?
never saw a single one in Western Pennsylvania growing up
i have never even heard of "Fias" brand, but you say it has a tone chamber,
so it might be worth looking closer to see if it has any other upgrade
features, like walnut keys and dual pivot action. Chambered models
do tend to be in the higher end, while straight boxes can be student
or pro but still look pretty much the same