• If you haven't done so already, please add a location to your profile. This helps when people are trying to assist you, suggest resources, etc. Thanks (Click the "X" to the top right of this message to disable it)

Stradella Bass System Fingerings

murathan

Was a Bassoonist
Joined
Mar 27, 2024
Messages
523
Reaction score
865
Location
Republic of Turkey
There are 2 approaches on bass side fingerings for using bass and chord buttons (main hand position). For making oompah...

(Fingers numbered from Thumb: 1, to Pinky: 5 on both hands)

German Style (4-3-2)
Many modern teachers always suggest that. You press bass buttons with finger 4 and divide the 3-2 to chord buttons.
3 for major - minor, 2 for 7th and Diminished.

American Style (3-2)
You press bass buttons with 3, using 2 for chord buttons. Simple choice.

Playing scales is another matter. I find American style 3-2 very easy and comfortable and use that. They say American style is coming from Concertina, while German style is coming from German Folk accordions. What are your thoughts?
 
I started teaching myself from an accordion book and played 4-3-2. Then I took lessons and the teacher suggested 3-2. I think now that was a mistake, now that I'm:
  • I'm playing more melodic bass lines on the root & counter rows (playing in a rock band!)
  • Playing more 7 chords in oom-pah folk accordion music
 
Last edited:
I use mostly 4,3 (4,2 for the 7th, dim). I use all 4 fingers for counter bass and runs or scalar patterns.
 
The stradella book “The Mighty Accordion” recommends the 4-3 method. Some of my other books describe both with a preference for 4-3. My instructor insists on 4-3. Good enough for me.

But when practicing scales/runs on bass/counter base I’m using whatever makes sense. Before I tore up my left shoulder I was getting fairly comfortable with running up and down the scale.
 
Since I train with the Anzaghi method, I use the 4-3-2 system.

The methods and works of Pietro Deiro and Charles Magnente that I studied are also arranged according to the 4-3-2 system.
 
I default to 3 2- go to 4 3 2 depending on the progression of the particular music and, I hate to say it, frequently add finger 5 which I find especially useful for descending minor scales.

It is also useful with the quint system- though I'm still pretty clumsy with same.

The two "primary" methods have in their favor the same reliability as does using one foot for both the accelerator and braking on a car; two feet might arguably be more efficient but under stress one might eat the back end of a dump truck...

For most the pinky finger is quite awkward, slow, and inaccurate, but I figure that's because it doesn't get used. Once one sets their mind to it it becomes a real boon in many situations.

I pick no quarrel with those who point out spectacularly skilled accordionists who see no need- it clearly can be done without and more power to you- but I know a pianist* with nine fingers who can play rings around most and match right up with the best. Given my druthers, I'd prefer a ten finger piano technique and a four fingered Stradella method.



*That's piano as in the 88 key model.
 
Last edited:
On 4-3-2, hand stays a little awkward. Also anatomically 4 and 5 are extra fingers (for helping grip or if others injured). 3 is a strong finger and in the middle, so there are fingers ready for up and down. Making minor "cross" oompah is convenient on 3-2 while major cross is convenient in 4-3-2. On these moves in 4-3-2, fingers are crossing over and hand gets a bad posture. Both styles are about getting used to. After that you feel comfortable.
 
In my wildly-less-skilled-than-Zevy approach I use all basses in the same row going down on minor scales but the usual mixed approach going up.
 
Back
Top