It's simple:
The PA will always be regarded as the street/folk instrument.
The CBA is the real accordion. Unique, classy, and more versatile.
It's simple:
The PA will always be regarded as the street/folk instrument.
The CBA is the real accordion. Unique, classy, and more versatile.
I’ve read that article. Yes, lots of great information; so thank you for suggesting it.Hi 4thpage,
I can't add much to what has already been said. PA and the two CBA variants (C-system and B-system) each have their advantages and disadvantages, and there are fantastically talented accordionists who play each type. If you would like to read an in-depth technical comparison of the two, I can suggest this article:
Exactly! The coolness factor!This technical comparison is very interesting, but the choice of which is best for you is going to be subjective. There is no wrong choice, but which one do you feel most attracted to and more motivated to learn? Personally, I played folk music as an amateur musician on PA for about 20 years. This seemed to be the logical choice, as I already knew the piano keyboard (also, I knew nothing of the CBA). I eventually met another accordionist who played the CBA and became fascinated by it. He had a spare instrument which I borrowed for a few months. I decided I really liked it better than the PA (and in my opinion, it looked so much cooler). So, I switched to CBA and never looked back. In my case, I did not feel the need for a teacher, so that was not a factor.
Oh yes…I decided right away I wanted nothing to do with a diatonic! I think I would drive myself crazy.As for Oktoberfest music, many of those musicians play neither the PA nor CBA, but play a diatonic Steirische accordion. These are large button boxes, and may be mistaken for a CBA, but they are entirely different animals. They even have a special written notation called Griffschrift.
That’s good to hear!OP: I came to the accordion in a similar position to you (my instrument was violin, not trombone - but the common thread was knowing my theory well and my piano not-so-well), opted for CBA, and, while playing, have never once had cause to say to myself "gee I wish I was playing PA."
Seriously! PAs are everywhere and CBAs seem to all be locked away in basements and pawn shops or something.The times that I do wish I played PA are the times that I watch a dozen beautiful instruments for sale go by while I keep my eyes peeled for the elusive North American CBA if I want to upgrade or to expand my collection.
Lots of good points already and loads of kudos to 4thpage for replying to so many contributions. It often seems as if someone asks a question then never comes back to the discussion to reply or to appreciate replies.
This is an interesting idea…about the spacing, and about the foundational piano keyboard skills or lack thereof. Speaking of playing with other musicians, the near-effortless transposition on CBA is appealing for that reason as well.Just a couple of points.
As has already been said, a great deal depends on how what piano keyboard skills you already have, but from a given point I believe progress will be faster on CBA than PA, and....
It is easier to be accurate on CBA than PA, at a given skill level. Although the CBA keyboard has more notes "per square foot" the spacing between buttons on each row is quite large. It's easy to keep track of which row you're on and that large spacing makes it easy to hit the right button.
I had very limited "piano" skills and did two or three years on PA but was getting frustrated by how hard it was to get things "right every time" especially under pressure of playing with other people. When I changed to CBA I found progress was faster but also more accurate, I could be much more certain of getting things right every time. (I think this may come down to the PA keyboard needing a bedrock of good technique, which I didn't have.)
Good to hear that confirmation of what I was thinking!Firstly, I think it is an excellent idea to start with stradella bass accordion. It is a wonderful thing and forms the foundation for most accordionists. It is perfect for accompanying folk music of all kinds. For French and German folk music, this is a good bass system to start with.
GotchaWhen many people talk about about converter accordion, they are referring to chromatic converter bass system which is similar to the right hand, but it is quite different to the stradella bass, which is based on the circle of fifths.
That’s a very good point I hadn’t really thought of. I’d read about quints, but didn’t consider how that might be a nice addition/continuation of Stradella one day.There are actually two main types of free bass converter - chromatic and quint. In America quint accordion is important. It is based on the stradella bass layout. So after you have learned to play stradella bass accordion you can either learn a second bass system (chromatic) or you can simply develop your existing knowledge of stradella by learning quint. Quint is a very natural development of stradella bass and it is light. Quint converters (except the most extreme versions) often have very little added weight or bulk. The same is not usually true of chromatic converters. I play quint free bass system and think it is wonderful.
I see what you mean…especially in playing folk music vs classical.People rightly say button accordion has a bigger range, but in reality few can exhaust the limits of either type of accordion.
Excellent illustration!
That is certainly how I came into this discussion, but my mind is being opened to the idea of the PA. CBA just looks too cool, though!I think you already made your decision, your heart is in the CBA.
It's simple:
The PA will always be regarded as the street/folk instrument.
The CBA is the real accordion. Unique, classy, and more versatile.
The only reason i don't play CBA is because I can't be bothered with the time investment. If started out in it, I would not be thinking about switching back.
This is one frustration I’m having already, just in the researching of the topic. There seem to be several fingerings for the same things on CBA, where—as you say—PA has a fairly set technique/fingering pattern. But! The different fingerings for different keys (all of which I had to learn for my piano proficiency in grad school) seem so daunting to me!I also came from piano at an early age, through various musical instruments to PA about 30 years ago, then about 8 years ago got my first CBA, a 3 row French Maugein. I persevered for a while, then went back to the PA as I found that my fingers were being tied in knots. The one thing no one has mentioned yet is that, to play a simple scale on the PA, there is only one fingering method. Just check on here for fingerings for CBA and see how many variations come up!!. Also playing up the scale and back down don't necessarily use the same fingers on the CBA.
A valid consideration to be sure. I wonder if this is one of those things that comes with practice and proficiency, the way alternate fingerings on wind and string instruments (or slide positions in my case on trombone) make things easier and more efficient once you’ve learned to use them. Granted, I don’t know if I would ever get to that level of comfort and ease on the CBA, so maybe that makes PA a better choice from that particular aspect.Then come the 4 and 5 row CBAs where the 4th and 5th rows are repeats of the 1st and 2nd rows in order to make the fingering easier, which it does, but then brings up the question of which row to play the note on. Much easier on the PA as you had a choice of one!.
Yep!I would say that, if you had a thorough grounding in piano, then the CBA would be more difficult to transfer to than if you had limited or no experience of PA, which would be more like just learning to play a new instrument using your existing musical knowledge.
Congrats on your persistence and perseverance!I would add that, later I then went back to the CBA and bought a 4 row Paolo Soprani and then a Roland electronic CBA, which I am now committed to staying with, although I also have the odd PA lurking in the background, but they don't get used.
I don’t know if I’ll ever have the money for one of those!On a slightly different tack, whichever version you choose, I can heartily recommend the Roland V accordions, as you can play whichever genre of music you chose. You can chose which type of accordion you wish to play and even switch to freebass, of multiple types just by pressing a few buttons .
I appreciate it!So many questions, so many answers
The original Roland V Accordions needed an external speaker. Later incarnations added the speakers to the instrument, so if you get a new one (Fr1x, Fr4x, or Fr8x) you will have the speakers. If you are looking at a used one, you will have to check. I think the small Roland CBA (Fr1xb) would be a great choice, and you could always buy a "beater" CBA and/or PA to knock around with.
Do you think you’d have better luck on CBA? Do you feel like your limitations come from playing in less comfortable keys on the PA, something CBA might have made easier?I started out on PA, not even knowing that CBA existed, or free bass for that matter. Knowing what I know know I may have picked CBA becsuse it's cooler but I feel no reason to switch now, as I am limited more by skill than keyboard.
No, you explained it well; and I know exactly what you mean. On trombone, because of the way brass instruments work off the overtone series (i.e. the notes from bottom to top in a single slide position go fundamental-octave-fifth-octave-third-fifth etc. right up the overtone series), going up a two-octave Bb major scale for instance uses positions 1-6-4-3-1-4-2-1-3-4-3-1-#2-2-1. So that concept makes sense to me. Thanks for pointing it out though!CBA and PA accordions share this "straight line" idea in that (in the right hand at least) the right hand notes that are closer to your head are lower sounding than the notes that are closer to your feet. But whereas on PA the next higher note is always some number of steps in the exact same direction, the CBA zigzags to accomplish it. As a result, depending on how you have notation, pitch, and physical movement "mapped in your head/body," the notes can seem like they are going in the "wrong direction" (in a basic instinctual sort of a way).
I imagine that this could be described better by someone else. But I hope that it at least makes some sense.
Getting there is the difficulty indeed, and I don’t know if I will ever devote the hours and years of practice to learning accordion that I have to learning trombone for the last 30 years. Granted, I’m also not trying to play accordion professionally the way I do trombone (military band). I just want to have some fun and sound tolerable while doing it.Pipemajor,
I'm with you!
I also feel (purely speculatively) that the CBA is technically more like a guitar (where there are potentially a number of alternative fingerings/options for achieving the same melody) than a piano which chiefly has only one.
When playing, this multiplicity of options would surely be distracting?
No doubt, once mastery is achieved, this would no longer matter, as the player would settle into a routine of preferred options ( subconsciously, automatically discarding the others). Getting there is the difficulty!
There seem to be several fingerings for the same things on CBA, where—as you say—PA has a fairly set technique/fingering pattern. But! The different fingerings for different keys (all of which I had to learn for my piano proficiency in grad school) seem so daunting to me!
In my opinion that should be the primary reason for engaging in any activity which is a hobby and not a professionGetting there is the difficulty indeed, and I don’t know if I will ever devote the hours and years of practice to learning accordion that I have to learning trombone for the last 30 years. Granted, I’m also not trying to play accordion professionally the way I do trombone (military band). I just want to have some fun and sound tolerable while doing it.
Don't panic!
The point about there only being one way of fingering a piano keyboard simply isn't true - ask someone that plays (at a decent level) the organ, harpsichord or piano. This misconception probably comes from a modern (ish) system based on using all fingers in a certain way to achieve legato that is the ideal for romantic music. If you look at when keyboards were king before orchestras were everywhere (up to about Bach) the standard fingering was very different indeed to achieve detaché (or at least slightly less legato than a romantic legato) as the ideal was clarity in polyphonic music.
The good news is the older fingering based on using 2,3 and 4 mostly, makes this sort of music much easier to play, and applying the same principles on a CBA is to 'welcome an old friend'. I've always had at the back of my mind a notion that the fear of the CBA keyboard actually comes from piano players that have had a narrow exposure to one system of fingering or been taught in a very dogmatic way with romantic fingering scale books, hannon exercises or other forms of digital torture. These are not a natural use of the hand for an ocean of keyboard music.
The thing I've found fascinating about the 5 row CBA (as a life long piano player) is all keys are equal - scary, but liberating! Accordion people seem to favour clean playing too that is well articulated from Folk to Jazz to Classical - so early fingering is great to add to the mix.
Burn the scale books and read/watch below as these have got far more in common with the accordion than a romantic piano!
But we haven't yet told him about the British and Irish accordions which are both chromatic and diatonic.If we haven't already turned 4thpage off with our exposition of the bewildering variety of accordions and their keyboards, this further revelation concerning fingering options should seal the deal!
Tom, you are a breath of fresh Lake Michigan air!4th Page said:
"Do you think you’d have better luck on CBA? Do you feel like your limitations come from playing in less comfortable keys on the PA, something CBA might have made easier?"
No, to be honest, I'm not sure I'd be anywhere different if I had started on CBA. I play folk/traditional so limitations I have are all in my mind, rather than fingers. I don't go for the speedy technical virtuosity or the heavy two handed classical, so I believe whether I play PA or CBA is a moot point. The biggest advantage I see with CBA is that I could buy a Fr1 rather than Fr4 in CBA.