• If you haven't done so already, please add a location to your profile. This helps when people are trying to assist you, suggest resources, etc. Thanks (Click the "X" to the top right of this message to disable it)

Advanced musician asks: piano or button PA or CBA

Status
Not open for further replies.
I also came from piano at an early age, through various musical instruments to PA about 30 years ago, then about 8 years ago got my first CBA, a 3 row French Maugein. I persevered for a while, then went back to the PA as I found that my fingers were being tied in knots. The one thing no one has mentioned yet is that, to play a simple scale on the PA, there is only one fingering method. Just check on here for fingerings for CBA and see how many variations come up!!. Also playing up the scale and back down don't necessarily use the same fingers on the CBA.
Then come the 4 and 5 row CBAs where the 4th and 5th rows are repeats of the 1st and 2nd rows in order to make the fingering easier, which it does, but then brings up the question of which row to play the note on. Much easier on the PA as you had a choice of one!.
I would say that, if you had a thorough grounding in piano, then the CBA would be more difficult to transfer to than if you had limited or no experience of PA, which would be more like just learning to play a new instrument using your existing musical knowledge.
I would add that, later I then went back to the CBA and bought a 4 row Paolo Soprani and then a Roland electronic CBA, which I am now committed to staying with, although I also have the odd PA lurking in the background, but they don't get used.
After a good few years on the CBA ( admitted I'm not as committed/dedicated , as some on here), I still struggle with the fingering when playing a piece which I played on the PA without problems.
On a slightly different tack, whichever version you choose, I can heartily recommend the Roland V accordions, as you can play whichever genre of music you chose. You can chose which type of accordion you wish to play and even switch to freebass, of multiple types just by pressing a few buttons :giggle: .
So many questions, so many answers :unsure:
 
Regarding one of your questions:

The original Roland V Accordions needed an external speaker. Later incarnations added the speakers to the instrument, so if you get a new one (Fr1x, Fr4x, or Fr8x) you will have the speakers. If you are looking at a used one, you will have to check. I think the small Roland CBA (Fr1xb) would be a great choice, and you could always buy a "beater" CBA and/or PA to knock around with.

I started out on PA, not even knowing that CBA existed, or free bass for that matter. Knowing what I know know I may have picked CBA becsuse it's cooler but I feel no reason to switch now, as I am limited more by skill than keyboard. Btw, does anyone make a "finto" PA that looks like a CBA for that reverse coolness factor?

Good luck!
 
Last edited:
I also have an extensive background in music, and my music degree required a basic level of piano proficiency. But my main instrument was classical guitar. I also played the lute and viols (both of whose relative tunings are almost identical to guitar). Currently my focus is the accordina, which is CBA tuning.

I think that CBA fingering is the way to go, but with a major caveat.

In standard musical notation, notes that are higher on the staff sound higher in pitch than notes that are lower on the staff. There is a similar directionality on the piano— notes to the right are always higher than notes to the left. Musical pitch on the staff and on the piano is basically a "straight line" either up or down. String instruments are a little different, but similar enough, in that they have the same "straight line" of pitch when sticking to one string, and (usually) the adjacent strings are arranged in a "straight line," going higher or lower in a consistent direction. For example, a guitar player generally knows that as his left hand plays notes that are closer to his feet (either on one string, or moving to a different string) the pitch gets higher (exceptions to this are possible).

CBA and PA accordions share this "straight line" idea in that (in the right hand at least) the right hand notes that are closer to your head are lower sounding than the notes that are closer to your feet. But whereas on PA the next higher note is always some number of steps in the exact same direction, the CBA zigzags to accomplish it. As a result, depending on how you have notation, pitch, and physical movement "mapped in your head/body," the notes can seem like they are going in the "wrong direction" (in a basic instinctual sort of a way).

I imagine that this could be described better by someone else. But I hope that it at least makes some sense.
 
Last edited:
Pipemajor,
I'm with you!
I also feel (purely speculatively) that the CBA is technically more like a guitar (where there are potentially a number of alternative fingerings/options for achieving the same melody) than a piano which chiefly has only one.
When playing, this multiplicity of options would surely be distracting?
No doubt, once mastery is achieved, this would no longer matter, as the player would settle into a routine of preferred options ( subconsciously, automatically discarding the others). Getting there is the difficulty!😄
 
Hi 4thpage,

I can't add much to what has already been said. PA and the two CBA variants (C-system and B-system) each have their advantages and disadvantages, and there are fantastically talented accordionists who play each type. If you would like to read an in-depth technical comparison of the two, I can suggest this article:

I’ve read that article. Yes, lots of great information; so thank you for suggesting it.
This technical comparison is very interesting, but the choice of which is best for you is going to be subjective. There is no wrong choice, but which one do you feel most attracted to and more motivated to learn? Personally, I played folk music as an amateur musician on PA for about 20 years. This seemed to be the logical choice, as I already knew the piano keyboard (also, I knew nothing of the CBA). I eventually met another accordionist who played the CBA and became fascinated by it. He had a spare instrument which I borrowed for a few months. I decided I really liked it better than the PA (and in my opinion, it looked so much cooler). So, I switched to CBA and never looked back. In my case, I did not feel the need for a teacher, so that was not a factor.
Exactly! The coolness factor! 😂
As for Oktoberfest music, many of those musicians play neither the PA nor CBA, but play a diatonic Steirische accordion. These are large button boxes, and may be mistaken for a CBA, but they are entirely different animals. They even have a special written notation called Griffschrift.
Oh yes…I decided right away I wanted nothing to do with a diatonic! I think I would drive myself crazy. 😆

OP: I came to the accordion in a similar position to you (my instrument was violin, not trombone - but the common thread was knowing my theory well and my piano not-so-well), opted for CBA, and, while playing, have never once had cause to say to myself "gee I wish I was playing PA."
That’s good to hear!
The times that I do wish I played PA are the times that I watch a dozen beautiful instruments for sale go by while I keep my eyes peeled for the elusive North American CBA if I want to upgrade or to expand my collection.
Seriously! PAs are everywhere and CBAs seem to all be locked away in basements and pawn shops or something. 😢

Lots of good points already and loads of kudos to 4thpage for replying to so many contributions. It often seems as if someone asks a question then never comes back to the discussion to reply or to appreciate replies.
:)
Just a couple of points.
As has already been said, a great deal depends on how what piano keyboard skills you already have, but from a given point I believe progress will be faster on CBA than PA, and....
It is easier to be accurate on CBA than PA, at a given skill level. Although the CBA keyboard has more notes "per square foot" the spacing between buttons on each row is quite large. It's easy to keep track of which row you're on and that large spacing makes it easy to hit the right button.
I had very limited "piano" skills and did two or three years on PA but was getting frustrated by how hard it was to get things "right every time" especially under pressure of playing with other people. When I changed to CBA I found progress was faster but also more accurate, I could be much more certain of getting things right every time. (I think this may come down to the PA keyboard needing a bedrock of good technique, which I didn't have.)
This is an interesting idea…about the spacing, and about the foundational piano keyboard skills or lack thereof. Speaking of playing with other musicians, the near-effortless transposition on CBA is appealing for that reason as well.

Firstly, I think it is an excellent idea to start with stradella bass accordion. It is a wonderful thing and forms the foundation for most accordionists. It is perfect for accompanying folk music of all kinds. For French and German folk music, this is a good bass system to start with.
Good to hear that confirmation of what I was thinking!
When many people talk about about converter accordion, they are referring to chromatic converter bass system which is similar to the right hand, but it is quite different to the stradella bass, which is based on the circle of fifths.
Gotcha 👍
There are actually two main types of free bass converter - chromatic and quint. In America quint accordion is important. It is based on the stradella bass layout. So after you have learned to play stradella bass accordion you can either learn a second bass system (chromatic) or you can simply develop your existing knowledge of stradella by learning quint. Quint is a very natural development of stradella bass and it is light. Quint converters (except the most extreme versions) often have very little added weight or bulk. The same is not usually true of chromatic converters. I play quint free bass system and think it is wonderful.
That’s a very good point I hadn’t really thought of. I’d read about quints, but didn’t consider how that might be a nice addition/continuation of Stradella one day.
People rightly say button accordion has a bigger range, but in reality few can exhaust the limits of either type of accordion.
I see what you mean…especially in playing folk music vs classical.
Excellent illustration!

I think you already made your decision, your heart is in the CBA.
That is certainly how I came into this discussion, but my mind is being opened to the idea of the PA. CBA just looks too cool, though!
It's simple:
The PA will always be regarded as the street/folk instrument.
The CBA is the real accordion. Unique, classy, and more versatile.
😂
The only reason i don't play CBA is because I can't be bothered with the time investment. If started out in it, I would not be thinking about switching back.
👍
 
I also came from piano at an early age, through various musical instruments to PA about 30 years ago, then about 8 years ago got my first CBA, a 3 row French Maugein. I persevered for a while, then went back to the PA as I found that my fingers were being tied in knots. The one thing no one has mentioned yet is that, to play a simple scale on the PA, there is only one fingering method. Just check on here for fingerings for CBA and see how many variations come up!!. Also playing up the scale and back down don't necessarily use the same fingers on the CBA.
This is one frustration I’m having already, just in the researching of the topic. There seem to be several fingerings for the same things on CBA, where—as you say—PA has a fairly set technique/fingering pattern. But! The different fingerings for different keys (all of which I had to learn for my piano proficiency in grad school) seem so daunting to me! 😭
Then come the 4 and 5 row CBAs where the 4th and 5th rows are repeats of the 1st and 2nd rows in order to make the fingering easier, which it does, but then brings up the question of which row to play the note on. Much easier on the PA as you had a choice of one!.
A valid consideration to be sure. I wonder if this is one of those things that comes with practice and proficiency, the way alternate fingerings on wind and string instruments (or slide positions in my case on trombone) make things easier and more efficient once you’ve learned to use them. Granted, I don’t know if I would ever get to that level of comfort and ease on the CBA, so maybe that makes PA a better choice from that particular aspect.
I would say that, if you had a thorough grounding in piano, then the CBA would be more difficult to transfer to than if you had limited or no experience of PA, which would be more like just learning to play a new instrument using your existing musical knowledge.
Yep!
I would add that, later I then went back to the CBA and bought a 4 row Paolo Soprani and then a Roland electronic CBA, which I am now committed to staying with, although I also have the odd PA lurking in the background, but they don't get used.
Congrats on your persistence and perseverance! 👏
On a slightly different tack, whichever version you choose, I can heartily recommend the Roland V accordions, as you can play whichever genre of music you chose. You can chose which type of accordion you wish to play and even switch to freebass, of multiple types just by pressing a few buttons .
I don’t know if I’ll ever have the money for one of those! 💰
So many questions, so many answers
I appreciate it!

The original Roland V Accordions needed an external speaker. Later incarnations added the speakers to the instrument, so if you get a new one (Fr1x, Fr4x, or Fr8x) you will have the speakers. If you are looking at a used one, you will have to check. I think the small Roland CBA (Fr1xb) would be a great choice, and you could always buy a "beater" CBA and/or PA to knock around with.
👍
I started out on PA, not even knowing that CBA existed, or free bass for that matter. Knowing what I know know I may have picked CBA becsuse it's cooler but I feel no reason to switch now, as I am limited more by skill than keyboard.
Do you think you’d have better luck on CBA? Do you feel like your limitations come from playing in less comfortable keys on the PA, something CBA might have made easier?

CBA and PA accordions share this "straight line" idea in that (in the right hand at least) the right hand notes that are closer to your head are lower sounding than the notes that are closer to your feet. But whereas on PA the next higher note is always some number of steps in the exact same direction, the CBA zigzags to accomplish it. As a result, depending on how you have notation, pitch, and physical movement "mapped in your head/body," the notes can seem like they are going in the "wrong direction" (in a basic instinctual sort of a way).

I imagine that this could be described better by someone else. But I hope that it at least makes some sense.
No, you explained it well; and I know exactly what you mean. On trombone, because of the way brass instruments work off the overtone series (i.e. the notes from bottom to top in a single slide position go fundamental-octave-fifth-octave-third-fifth etc. right up the overtone series), going up a two-octave Bb major scale for instance uses positions 1-6-4-3-1-4-2-1-3-4-3-1-#2-2-1. So that concept makes sense to me. Thanks for pointing it out though!
 
Pipemajor,
I'm with you!
I also feel (purely speculatively) that the CBA is technically more like a guitar (where there are potentially a number of alternative fingerings/options for achieving the same melody) than a piano which chiefly has only one.
When playing, this multiplicity of options would surely be distracting?
No doubt, once mastery is achieved, this would no longer matter, as the player would settle into a routine of preferred options ( subconsciously, automatically discarding the others). Getting there is the difficulty!😄
Getting there is the difficulty indeed, and I don’t know if I will ever devote the hours and years of practice to learning accordion that I have to learning trombone for the last 30 years. Granted, I’m also not trying to play accordion professionally the way I do trombone (military band). I just want to have some fun and sound tolerable while doing it. 😂
 
There seem to be several fingerings for the same things on CBA, where—as you say—PA has a fairly set technique/fingering pattern. But! The different fingerings for different keys (all of which I had to learn for my piano proficiency in grad school) seem so daunting to me!

Don't panic!

The point about there only being one way of fingering a piano keyboard simply isn't true - ask someone that plays (at a decent level) the organ, harpsichord or piano. This misconception probably comes from a modern (ish) system based on using all fingers in a certain way to achieve legato that is the ideal for romantic music. If you look at when keyboards were king before orchestras were everywhere (up to about Bach) the standard fingering was very different indeed to achieve detaché (or at least slightly less legato than a romantic legato) as the ideal was clarity in polyphonic music.

The good news is the older fingering based on using 2,3 and 4 mostly, makes this sort of music much easier to play, and applying the same principles on a CBA is to 'welcome an old friend'. I've always had at the back of my mind a notion that the fear of the CBA keyboard actually comes from piano players that have had a narrow exposure to one system of fingering or been taught in a very dogmatic way with romantic fingering scale books, hannon exercises or other forms of digital torture. These are not a natural use of the hand for an ocean of keyboard music.

The thing I've found fascinating about the 5 row CBA (as a life long piano player) is all keys are equal - scary, but liberating! Accordion people seem to favour clean playing too that is well articulated from Folk to Jazz to Classical - so early fingering is great to add to the mix.

Burn the scale books and read/watch below as these have got far more in common with the accordion than a romantic piano!
 
Last edited:
Getting there is the difficulty indeed, and I don’t know if I will ever devote the hours and years of practice to learning accordion that I have to learning trombone for the last 30 years. Granted, I’m also not trying to play accordion professionally the way I do trombone (military band). I just want to have some fun and sound tolerable while doing it. 😂
In my opinion that should be the primary reason for engaging in any activity which is a hobby and not a profession (y) :)
 
Don't panic!

The point about there only being one way of fingering a piano keyboard simply isn't true - ask someone that plays (at a decent level) the organ, harpsichord or piano. This misconception probably comes from a modern (ish) system based on using all fingers in a certain way to achieve legato that is the ideal for romantic music. If you look at when keyboards were king before orchestras were everywhere (up to about Bach) the standard fingering was very different indeed to achieve detaché (or at least slightly less legato than a romantic legato) as the ideal was clarity in polyphonic music.

The good news is the older fingering based on using 2,3 and 4 mostly, makes this sort of music much easier to play, and applying the same principles on a CBA is to 'welcome an old friend'. I've always had at the back of my mind a notion that the fear of the CBA keyboard actually comes from piano players that have had a narrow exposure to one system of fingering or been taught in a very dogmatic way with romantic fingering scale books, hannon exercises or other forms of digital torture. These are not a natural use of the hand for an ocean of keyboard music.

The thing I've found fascinating about the 5 row CBA (as a life long piano player) is all keys are equal - scary, but liberating! Accordion people seem to favour clean playing too that is well articulated from Folk to Jazz to Classical - so early fingering is great to add to the mix.

Burn the scale books and read/watch below as these have got far more in common with the accordion than a romantic piano!

Are you saying to take comfort in knowing a dogmatic insistence on "proper" piano fingerings isn't necessary on PA, or that CBA is so appealing because, like keyboarding in Baroque times, CBA doesn't need one to learn a prescribed system so necessarily? Either way is encouraging!😀
 
Maybe it should be mentioned that for the beginner, there is more than the choice of PA, CBA-C, or CBA-B. When it comes to picking a specific instrument, there is the obvious choice of note range and number of basses, and for the CBA, whether to choose 3, 4, or 5 rows of treble buttons. What many not be so obvious is that each of these instruments come in variants that have different size keyboards or buttons.

There is the full-sized PA keyboard that most adults play, but also ones with narrower keys, that may be more comfortable for those with smaller hands.

For the CBA, my observation is that there are instruments with 14-15mm diameter buttons and a button spacing that is the same as on a diatonic melodeon, and those with 16-17mm diameter buttons and a wider spacing. I don't know that this has anything to do with hand size. The CBA in my profile photo has the smaller buttons. Most of the big black Italian CBAs you see have the larger buttons.

Also, there are two different cabinet (box) designs for CBAs. On a CBA, all of the notes are distributed across 3 rows, so correspondingly, accordion cabinets designed specifically for a CBA use three rows of pallets (reed values). For the same note range, these will be deeper (front to back) and shorter (top to bottom) than a PA cabinet, which has the notes distributed across two rows of pallets (one for the white keys, one for the black keys). However, some manufacturers that offer the same model in both PA and CBA versions use the PA cabinet for the CBA version as well. You can recognize these CBAs because they are shallower (front to back) and longer (top to bottom) than a "proper" CBA. My impression is that this type of CBA usually has the larger buttons.

I am not saying there is anything wrong with either design, but I think it is good to be aware of these differences, before you decide on your dream instrument. For starting out, either button size will do.
 
Last edited:
If we haven't already turned 4thpage off with our exposition of the bewildering variety of accordions and their keyboards, this further revelation concerning fingering options should seal the deal!🤣😂
But we haven't yet told him about the British and Irish accordions which are both chromatic and diatonic.
 
4th Page said:

"Do you think you’d have better luck on CBA? Do you feel like your limitations come from playing in less comfortable keys on the PA, something CBA might have made easier?"

No, to be honest, I'm not sure I'd be anywhere different if I had started on CBA. I play folk/traditional so limitations I have are all in my mind, rather than fingers. I don't go for the speedy technical virtuosity or the heavy two handed classical, so I believe whether I play PA or CBA is a moot point. The biggest advantage I see with CBA is that I could buy a Fr1 rather than Fr4 in CBA.
 
4th Page said:

"Do you think you’d have better luck on CBA? Do you feel like your limitations come from playing in less comfortable keys on the PA, something CBA might have made easier?"

No, to be honest, I'm not sure I'd be anywhere different if I had started on CBA. I play folk/traditional so limitations I have are all in my mind, rather than fingers. I don't go for the speedy technical virtuosity or the heavy two handed classical, so I believe whether I play PA or CBA is a moot point. The biggest advantage I see with CBA is that I could buy a Fr1 rather than Fr4 in CBA.
Tom, you are a breath of fresh Lake Michigan air!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top