• If you haven't done so already, please add a location to your profile. This helps when people are trying to assist you, suggest resources, etc. Thanks (Click the "X" to the top right of this message to disable it)

Palmer-Hughes Quint Free Bass

Just watched the Galliano video - my schoolboy French can just about manage it! Watch one of the greatest accordionists that ever lived play the easiest quint scale in C major at 5.30 and the slight unevenness as he ends the first octave and begins the second in a way that no other instrument would do. You can see why if you look at the acrobatics his hand is having to do at that moment. Magnify that issue by 100 for us lesser mortals!
The opening to Suite No. 1 looked easier than on chromatic free bass to be fair! Or maybe he just made it look easy 🤔
 
Well, I think the gentleman on the quint freebass review has no doubt done his best to try to experience the quint system. Though sadly it seems he does not know the correct finger patterns to work through multiple octaves smoothly. But why would he? He is just casually trying to make sense of it without knowing the established methods - he is just messing around and uses his stradella knowledge. Maybe though having a little knowledge is not always the best basis for giving good advice.

Now, I admire Mr Galliano, and the great man was casually showing the interviewer that he has three octaves of quint that can follow the same pattern as stradella. Each rank running from C to B. However, the maestro would easily play any multi octave scale he wished perfectly, and the technique for multiple octaves is playable in a number of different ways. Flexibility is a bonus of quint. Also, Mr Galliano plays both chromatic converter and quint converter and it is very clear he prefers quint.

As Galliano will know inside-out, there is certainly an established method for scales and arpeggios over multiple octaves, and the finger patterns are different to simple stradella. If our Danp76 wishes, I will share some useful resources for performing multiple octaves on the major and minor scales on quint, per the academic methods of the Italian conservatoire.

For example, here's a quick rattle of a major scale.



Petch, I think you are right on both points. Galliano makes music look easy, but to be fair I think that piece probably is easier on quint converter too.​
 
Last edited:
The gentleman who tried his best:
 
Thank you! I don't know where the world would be without such sagacity. However the experience of my own ears leads to a different picture based on many very good amateur players (far better than me) on subject of stradella scales.
 
If only we could come to simple conclusions about accordions whatever their design.
More good reading here:


Click on the author's name to discover another fascinating man who, it turns out, plays quint PA.

Maybe apocryphal: I once heard that the C system was a rip-off of the Russians' B system to avoid patent difficulties.
Whatever the truth of that, few would argue that the mirrored LH is superior to the usual Bayan arrangement which is the other way about. And Russians seem to have taken the accordion seriously a long time before the West and with greater success.
 
More on David Lange:
Try his 'Stretching Stadella' (sic)
And his
Tritone substitutions for Stradella and their usefulness in Jazz. Or how to avoid a jump from Amin to Ab
Also his audio illusion of a chromatic progression using the above on the Stradella LH.
 
It was written at the end of the last century but is still a great read - thanks for sharing!
I'm very interested in Soviet era music and put quite a few years in researching lost music of that time for another instrument (which is another story). There a some real positives in there about why the Soviet accordion seems to have been so strong:

- no cultural demarcation between folk and classical music (we could learn from this)
- top Soviet composers wrote for the instrument (why haven't they generally done so in the West until comparatively recently?)
- music education wasn't the preserve of those with affluent parents (massive issue here that only seems to be getting more pronounced)

The only thing I'd add to why the Soviet Union produced such amazing art is 'suffering'. I found through my acquaintance that the greatest composers and real creatives have some sort of deep emotional wound, out of which great art is born. Not an original idea, pretty central to most religion and some philosophy, but there can't be that many countries that have suffered under their rulers quite as much as Russia has over recent centuries.
 
The problem with Quint is its playing cricket using the rules of football.

The guy in the 'Quint Bass Review' video explains the fundamental issue starting at 2.15 to 3.00 which (before you even get into Quint bass) is simply the level of athleticism needed to play a simple scale on stradella: it isn't an easy or natural use of the hand. I stand by this possibly controversial statement, not only from personal experience when learning stradella scales (thinking what other instrument has the level of complexity to play such a basic unit of music) but also by listening to other far more experienced players. They take a deep breath and execute a fast stradella scale perfectly; then they do it again or play it in the context of real music and muff it. I've heard this time and time again - its not that they are bad players and haven't practised a lot, its that the athletic demands placed on the hand playing multiple scale sections are simply unreasonable - too dammed difficult! I'd contrast that with the ease of playing consecutive notes on a minor 3rd based system such as C or B systems.

Applying this to classical music (much of which is composed of partial scales up to around 3-6 consecutive notes) and you are being sent out to play cricket with a broken bat. Yes, it can be done with a lifetime of dedication, but the level of practice to perfect an awkward use of the hand is beyond most people's level of patience and time. Perhaps this is why many amateur quint bass players do a broken chordy melange type thing with their left hand because its so much easier than consecutive notes.

The other revelation from this video (which I hadn't previously understood) is that Quint bass casually jettisons the main advantage of stradella bass where the circle of fifths layout means that once one can play stradella in one key, you can play it in all keys with identical movements. Look further on in the video as he moves from the scale of C to D.

Normally a good idea from the richest country in the world with the wealthiest consumers will become globally dominant. The fact it hasn't and something else has for the classical accordion is revealing. To take the idea to absurdity, consider applying the quint bass system to the right hand and have left and right hands mirrored: a concertina crossed with a nightmare of complexity in a mirror.

A fifths based bass keyboard is ideally suited to the dance music for which it was conceived. If you've had most of your life embedded in stradella bass and want to branch out I can see why Quint looks tempting. I do have a strong sense though that after an initial rush, you are going to get stuck on a terribly torturous journey and that an average beginner learning a different bass system is going to quickly overtake you if they want to play a broader range of music.

Cricket and football are both great games - but there are sensibly two different approaches which fit each game perfectly.

I just started looking at the layout of Quint Free Bass on my 8X. At first it looked easy, since the basic pattern is Stradella that I am familiar with, but crossing to a different “2 row” group can be tricky. There are 3 octaves of notes with the lowest octave starting at C1 and the highest octave starting at C3. I have no problem when all the notes are from C1 to B1. As pointed out in the video, it’s the “Crossover” point (octave 2) from B1 to C2 that causes a problem. Also, the row change at the “Crossover” point (octave 3) from B2 to C3.

For example, take a walking bass twelve bar blues I, IV, V pattern in different “Keys”:
C pattern: |C1, E1, G1, A1| |Bb1, A1, G1, E1|
F pattern: |F1, A1, C2, D2| |Eb2, D2, C2, A1|
G Pattern: |G1, B1, D2, E2| |F2, E2, D2, B1|
The pattern changes are different for each “Key” with a “2 row” shift for every “Key” except C.

There are probably some rules (fingering) for playing notes over 3 octaves for the Quint system. This is what I do. I I am sure, is not the most efficient. When I play a note, I think of which octave the note is in and the two “Crossover” points: from B1 to C2 and B2 to C3. That determines which “2 row” group of buttons I am in. This works, but it really slows me down. It’s like when I was learning Spanish in high school. I would think of the word translation to English. This was awkward and slow. It was only when I could “think” directly in Spanish, that I started to improve. I don’t know if I ever will teach this ole brain to “think” in Quint Free Bass.

John M.
 
Hi John M,

The thing with playing scales on quint converter is that you are not bound by the finger patterns of stadella. There are whole new paths available, and they transform the experience entirely. This is where our friend on the quint review has really missed the mark badly. It is not his fault, there are simply other routes available. It just requires a little lateral thinking (or the scales sheet with finger work notated). When you choose the right paths, the 'crossover point' melts away, it becomes a flow. It is a real shame that some people will make a decision without knowing the correct finger pattern.

Quint has its own finger options. (the 'c' beside a number means counter bass)

C major on stradella: 4 - 2 - 4c - 5 - 3 - 5c - 3c - 4
C major on quint : 2 - 5c - 3c - 4- 2 - 5c - 3c - 2 (the last note on the 2nd finger is the start of the next octave).

After a little practice of the new finger pattern the results are quite remarkable. The octaves will fall into place. Every musical key will have it's own best finger pattern. This is where it is a good idea to have the right study materials - so you can know how to make the best choice. No point guessing it.

I am happy to take some time to try and help anyone who is open to the possibility of the quint system. It genuinely has some wonderful potential, and I think it's great.​
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the example Walker.

I can see I have to "open up" my thinking to different fingering. One thing I never would have tried would be the D in the counter bass row across from the Bb. Also, I have to get used to using finger #5. Now I need to practice the patterns so that they become more "2nd nature".

Those Free Bass tones sure sound nice.

John M.
 
@John M. My friend, we both have one or two things to learn... Today I received a present from my friend in Italy Prof. Francesco Palazzo. It was the complete Invenzioni A Due Voci (B.W.V 772/786) and Invenzioni A Tre Voci (Sinfonie) B.W.V 787/801. by J.S Bach, fully transcribed for quint converter accordion (though I prefer the term fisarmonica da concerto:)) by none other than the father of the Italian classical accordion - Salvatore Di Gesualdo.

If you want, John M. send me a PM. and I can perhaps share with you a few more of the scales - with all the correct fingers added. ;) It always helps to know the rules of the game.
 
Last edited:
Wow, it's been over a year since this thread started. I wanted to revisit and share a few thing that I've learned...​
Hi everyone, does anyone know where I could purchase the Palmer-Hughes Converter instruction books? They seem like they are difficult to find. Thank you.​
Dan, I don't know if you ever managed to obtain a Palmer-Hughes instruction book. If not, I think you may have a little more luck looking towards Italy for instruction manuals & music on Quint Converter. Italy is THE place for Quint free bass, there is no doubt about it. However, if possible, I would suggest you try and obtain a copy of Introduzione Allo Studio Dei Bassi Sciolti by Eliana Zajec. It's designed for beginners.

This last year I have had to undertake a lot of self-directed learning as unfortunately (unless you live in an area where there are people who can give you instruction on free bass) you are on your own a bit. I previously tried to give a little bit of advice based on my limited knowledge of the system:
1. Select a simple piece of music you like (with or without sheet music), something slow and lyrical.
2. Select free bass mode.
3. Experiment with finding harmonious bass sounds.​
Now, what I wrote is fine; a bit like a self taught guitarist writing songs by strumming nice sounding chords on a guitar. It will work to an extent. However, ideally any person undertaking new studies should do so with structure and incremental steps. Knowing how to play stradella bass is a start, but really it's the tip of the iceberg. You will only get 'so far' by adapting stradella techniques. Quint teaches you what you don't know about stradella bass. For me it was a big lesson.

I think in addition to the book I have mentioned above, a person should try to learn the scales. I have a copy of the correct scale fingering for each key (it's a considerable contrast to the stradella scales) if anyone wants it. It's like being good at draughts (checkers) and then finding out afterwards that chess exists. LOL.

I have learned that free bass gives a better appreciation of 'pitch' in the left hand and vastly improved knowledge of the bass keyboard.

So far, I have found that the fingering options and hand positions I would previously have selected are totally different to what a concert artist would use. I am beginning to understand better this instrument, particularly as I try to study some of the Bach keyboard works. I now find I enjoy best the music that is essentially single lines of melody/counter melody on each hand. There are very good scores of Bach transcribed with incredible fingering written out. My previous experience of 'correct fingering' seem 1 dimensional by comparison now. However, to be good at anything is difficult and I am challenged musically every day.

Something new also since last year - I am also enjoying learning the button accordion with chromatic converter too, thanks to my good friend @saundersbp who let me borrow one of his accordions. CBA with chromatic converter is the perfect contrast to PA with Quint, but it's really excellent too. I appreciate both systems more fully now that I have learned more about them and can work on them together.

How time flies...​
 
Last edited:
Wow, it's been over a year since this thread started. I wanted to revisit and share a few thing that I've learned...

Dan, I don't know if you ever managed to obtain a Palmer-Hughes instruction book. If not, I think you may have a little more luck looking towards Italy for instruction manuals & music on Quint Converter. Italy is THE place for Quint free bass, there is no doubt about it. However, if possible, I would suggest you try and obtain a copy of Introduzione Allo Studio Dei Bassi Sciolti by Eliana Zajec. It's designed for beginners.

This last year I have had to undertake a lot of self-directed learning as unfortunately (unless you like in an area where there are people who can give you instruction on free bass) you are on your own a bit. I previously tried to give a little bit of advice based on my limited knowledge of the system:


Now, what I wrote is fine; a bit like a self taught guitarist writing songs by strumming nice sounding chords on a guitar. It will work to an extent. However, ideally any person undertaking new studies should do so with structure and incremental steps. Knowing how to play stradella bass is a start, but really it's the tip of the iceberg. You will only get 'so far' by adapting stradella techniques. Quint teaches you what you don't know about stradella bass. For me it was a big lesson.

I think in addition to the book I have mentioned above, a person should try to learn the scales. I have a copy of the correct scale fingering for each key (it's a considerable contrast to the stradella scales) if anyone wants it. It's like being good at draughts (checkers) and then finding out afterwards that chess exists. LOL.

I have learned that free bass gives a better appreciation of 'pitch' in the left hand and vastly improved knowledge of the bass keyboard.

So far, I have found that the fingering options and hand positions I would previously have selected are totally different to what a concert artist would use. I am beginning to understand better this instrument, particularly as I try to study some of the Bach keyboard works. I now find I enjoy best the music that is essentially single lines of melody/counter melody on each hand. There are very good scores of Bach transcribed with incredible fingering written out. My previous experience of 'correct fingering' seem 1 dimensional by comparison now. However, to be good at anything is difficult and I am challenged musically every day.

Something new also since last year - I am also enjoying learning the button accordion with chromatic converter too, thanks to my good friend @saundersbp who let me borrow one of his accordions. CBA with chromatic converter is the perfect contrast to PA with Quint, but it's really excellent too. I appreciate both systems more fully now that I have learned more about them and can work on them together.

How time flies...​
Thank you for this information, do you know where this book can be purchased? I’d be interested in the scale fingerings as well.
 
Hey Dan, just do an online search for the title: Introduzione Allo Studio Dei Bassi Sciolti. I did a quick check and it's mentioned on a number of different websites; including Sheetmusicplus, Boosey etc.

I've just ordered another book today by Eliana Zajec: Raccolta di Studi per Fisarmonica a Bassi Sciolti (Sistema per Quinte e Cromatico).

Regarding the scale fingerings, I can send you some scales, but a word of caution - scales can be daunting, so don't get bogged down in them. Just try a little to begin with, maybe practice one octave of a given major scale to start. There's no rush with scales, build your technique slowly and when it is comfortable playing a single octave, try making it a double...​
 
Last edited:
Oh dear, maybe this is where I have been going wrong - I've never done scales on any instruments, even the drums!
Glad to hear that. No offence, but in your case, please don't practice any scales! We can cope with the 'brilliant Ben Saunders' but the world is not ready for 'scary scales Saunders'. (y)
 
the world is not ready for 'scary scales Saunders'. (y)
In all seriousness although I don't do scales I have done the odd étude but only when it's actually a decent piece of music - many aren't unfortunately. I'd heartily recommend Philip Glass Etude no.6 for the accordion as it's great for repeated notes in the right hand and also chord positions in the left. At the end of it you also get a lovely piece of music into the bargain rather than a tedious technical exercise!
 
PS if you Google it don't bother with the accordionists playing it as they play it at unmusical speeds. There's a lovely 7mins plus version by the pianist Andrew Chubb which is super.
 
Back
Top