For myself, I'm very much of the opinion that the visuals of a performance are a huge part of (especially orchestral) music concerts, and a big part of that is seeing what a human has to do to get those sounds out. If I couldn't see the musicians actually making the music, then I'm with dak - I'd much rather just stay home and listen to the recording, where I can be getting other things done at the same time, and it's socially acceptable to use my phone or my laptop.
Absolutely. I read somewhere that less than 50% of a performance is the music - the rest being visual, audience interaction, atmosphere, etc.
We went to see a Pink Floyd some years ago. They were brilliant - not a note wrong, but there was no stage presence and it was like listening to a CD. While I will never be even close to their technical ability, I wouldn't see them again.
It's also something I've had to learn myself. Not an outgoing person, none-the-less I'm the lead singer in a band. We play renaissance-folk-rock and dress in renaissance outfits, and play instruments that look like they might be from the period. Engaging the audience with anecdotes, a bit of history, all seems to come together that we tend to get a good reception and re-booked. Despite our music being a bit obscure.
This was a publicity photo for last year's band line-up. Me on the right.
