Adim, Eb dim, F#dim, C dim.......
All inversions of same chord.....
I mean... that's true of fully-diminished 7ths, but not of a standard diminished triad. And it's usually not noted as a diminished 7th, but as a "C dim" or whatever. It's "just true enough" for them to get away with calling it a "C diminished 7", but without the flat fifth it really isn't one. I mean, if you show me those notes on paper or on piano, I'm going to say "A diminished". If you show it to me with the C at the bottom, I'll say "A diminished, 1st inversion". Without the G-flat, I'm not really calling it a "7th" of anything", because without the 5th your "7th" is the root. And yeah, it
is the
same thing as a C fully-diminished 7 that's just missing the 5th, but I feel like calling it a "C diminished 7", and particularly, abbreviating it most of the time as "C dim" is a bit of a white lie.
I mean, anyone with an understanding of music theory will understand that if you play an A dim atop an F, what you have is a dominant F7. But if you play an "A dim" over an F on the accordion, what you'll get is an ugly, ugly sound (I mean, idk, maybe you wanted a flat 9 in the mix? But given that the 9th will just as likely be played as a minor 2nd...). To get the a F7 on an accordion (ignoring the F7 button), the "correct" diminished chord to play would be "C dim", not "A dim", and this is why the naming is a bit disingenuous IMO. (In reality of course, if I want a full F7 I'm more likely to play FM and F7 simultaneously, so I've both the 5th and the 7th).
I mean, it's just a name, and I'm content (despite the rant here) to call it a "C dim" because that's what everyone else will do, and it'd be confusing (in an accordion context) to call it something else. But when I'm in "composer" mode, or thinking in terms of raw music theory, well then it's an A dim, because that's what the notes spell!
